Interesting. I'd forgotten about this seamy scandal.
11.2 ÷ 37 is about 0.3 USD each, before lawyers' fees (though the article states that claimants may receive up to 3500 each). Presumably not all users will qualify.
Whichever, the individual pay out looks nugatory - more of a slap on the wrist for breach of data protection.
I'm happy with that. Anything more substantial - e.g. mega damages for reputational loss or marital breakdown - and I'd invoke the volenti non fit injuria principle.